IMS Global: You
recently returned from a month-long trip to Europe where you attended
five different meetings and conferences. What are some of the
significant trends you've observed taking place in higher education
outside the United States?
NA: I have to be
careful how I frame my conclusions because I attended several very
different meetings. One was the Standing Committee of Presidents of the
International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE). This
year's meeting was devoted to the discussion of open educational
resources (OER). Open content has become a hot topic in Europe and in
some Asian countries right now. A good example of this model would be
at the Open University in the United Kingdom. They are building open
educational content so that you can go online as a faculty member or as
a student and, if there is a course or module that fits your needs, you
can take it and use it without charge, or you can modify it and give it
back to them if you want. ICDE is pursuing a major study on the OER in
cooperation with UNESCO. This topic was discussed at last year's
meeting as well, and at the time, I was skeptical of the OER movement,
especially concerning funding and sustainability. This year, I left
with the feeling that we have come a long way. Different funding models
are emerging, and the OER movement is beginning to grow legs around the
world. I don't know where it is going to lead, but it's something
institutions in North America need to watch.
In
Brussels, I attended a much different meeting of the European
Foundation for Management Development (EFMD). They have been building
an international accreditation system for business schools and
programs. It's starting to grow and institutions outside of Europe are
increasingly applying to achieve international accreditation through
them. This conference was attended by deans and rectors of some of the
more traditional business schools. My impression from those with whom I
talked, and from the tone of some of the presentations, was that this
group has not yet embraced the technology revolution taking place in
education, and certainly not Web 2.0. Interestingly, there were some
high profile business speakers at the meeting. It seemed to me they
were kind of chiding the attendees by telling them: "You need to take a
closer look at open content and open source, and use this openness as
an engine of creativity and innovation."
At the
other end of the spectrum, was the annual European Distance Education
Network (EDEN) meeting in Naples. This conference was devoted entirely
to discussion of Web 2.0. I came away feeling we were really peering
into the future. Something is happening out on the Web related to
learning. The jargon is changing: social networking, Web 3D, Virtual
Reality 2.0, pod casting, mobile learning, RSS feeds, and Wiki this and
Wiki that to name a few. Faculty and institutions abroad are starting
to use these technologies.
This
emerging Web 2.0 culture, where openness is a hallmark and the user is
in charge of his or her learning, is so foreign to the culture of
traditional higher education. The new culture is built on
constructivist learning; relies on the intelligence of the Web, swarm
intelligence, social networking. It's dynamic and continuously
changing. Where this is going to take us and how it will be integrated
with traditional approaches, I don't know. But we must not lag behind,
as we did in the U.S. with the mobile telecommunications industry a few
years ago. Other countries in Europe and Asia were years ahead of us in
integrating mobile technology with their culture and business systems-I
think the emergence of Web 2.0 technologies is something IMS might be
interested to follow closely.