A
quality educational experience
The
Spellings Commission report, along with work being conducted by
organizations such as the Council for Higher Education Accreditation
(CHEA) and the National Association of State Universities and
Land-Grant Colleges (NASULGC), highlight the struggle to define a
quality educational experience. What components make for a quality
education? Most agree the answer to that question is complex.
Luskin
believes a key component is learning how to learn; the ability to write
and speak clearly and to think critically and creatively. Another
component, adds Dan Devine, CEO of Compass Knowledge Group, is to be
able to complete one's formal education with a marketable skill that
will allow one to adapt to the needs of the marketplace. Says Lendo:
"Students must be prepared to live and work in a `flat,' 21st century
environment rooted in global competition and complex, strategic
partnerships."
Read
cites as an important component is excellent teachers who are
knowledgeable, enthusiastic and, when relevant, able to relate their
research activities to their teaching. Other important components, he
says, include: a stimulating cohort of students; a balance of passive
(reading and lectures) and active (projects, production, performance)
learning; good facilities and resources; and awareness and confirmation
of the knowledge and skills being acquired.
"On what
level does one define `educational experience?' asks Allen. "Does it
include the menu of services an institution wraps around its courses
and programs to support a student's progress and needs? Is it a
student's experience in a particular class from her interaction with
faculty, classmates, course materials, and learning objects? Is it the
student's measured growth in knowledge, skills, and abilities between
the beginning and end of that experience? Is it a student's measured
growth over a program of courses? I would argue that a quality
educational experience includes all of these, as defined in some set of
agreed upon metrics, however imperfect."
Technology
can serve as a powerful enabler of the learning experience,
particularly for the new majority of students: the older, working adult
student with working and family obligations as well as a
non-traditional schedule and outlook. Says Read: "By supporting the
learning process and flexible learning, technology allows students
freedom from the tyranny of time and geography."
Lombardi
defines learning technology as simply the implementation tools for the
work that higher education wants to accomplish. "Technology is always
expensive, and its value is hard to predict. People should sell their
stuff, see if it gets used, and watch markets emerge. Whoever figures
out how to make YouTube, iPod, and Facebook useable technologies will
win the war. Short term, however, there's lot of money to be made in
specialized niche products that give gee-whiz value to standard
educational products."
Learning
technology can enhance not only the access to content, but also the
interaction that takes place between students and faculty, and improve
assessment through the use of data, reporting analytics and assessment
portfolios, says Kelsall. "With the right information, faculty and
other stakeholders can use this data to enhance the learning experience
in a more systematic fashion than is possible if relying purely on
in-classroom information. Educational technology is a tool; the
effectiveness in the use of this tool requires training and
experience."
Kuttler
notes that as an increasing percentage of students opt to complete
their educational programs online, it is incumbent on educators to "use
the new technology tools effectively to promote student-to-faculty and
student-to-student communication, to work collaboratively, and to
engage in higher order skill development in areas like critical
thinking."