 |
IMS GLC Public Forums and Resources |
 |
 |
 |
| "Where the World's Leaders in Learning Converge"
join :
help :
calendar :
home
|
||
|
Latest News:
|
latest topics : statistics | |
|
Hide | |
Want to be notified when a new post is available?
There are two ways:
1) Digest Email: To sign up for a digest email, login in to your IMS community account and enter the forum. Click profile on the right hand side of the screen near the top, choose personal options, scroll down to category digest and highlight all the categories you wish to receive email notification from, then the click update profile button at the bottom.
2) You can bookmark and check the rss feed for the categories you are interested in. A link to the rss feed is on the right hand side (in orange) in each category. The IMS news Rss feed is: http://www.imsglobal.org/community/forum/rss.cfm?forumid=11&catid=46
|
Topic Title: differences between QTI versions Topic Summary: Created On: 08/25/2009 11:01 AM Status: Post and Reply |
Linear : Threading : Single : Branch |
 Topic Tools
|
08/25/2009 11:01 AM
|
|
|
People often wonder which version of QTI they should use. This thread is the place to discuss differences between the various versions of the QTI specification.
|
|
|
|
|
|
09/13/2009 03:31 PM
|
|
|
Mark,
I suggest we post Wilber's presentation from the IMS meeting in July. I'm sure Wilbert would agree to this when asked. Colin S. ------------------------- Colin Smythe IMS GLC Chief Architect |
|
|
|
|
|
09/18/2009 09:44 AM
|
|
|
Colin,
Wilbert's presentation from Montreal is posted in the CC Alliance forum. Many of the ideas from his slides came from Niall Barr. Niall has agreed to expand these and will provide the details here as this is a pretty common question for QTI. - Mark |
|
|
|
|
|
11/09/2009 02:09 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
08/05/2010 05:02 AM
|
|
|
Hi,
thank you for the list. Why is it that there is nothing mentioned about QTI 2.0? Marjan |
|
|
|
|
|
08/10/2010 11:08 AM
|
|
|
Hello,
I wasn't directly involved in QTI at the time, but I think the main difference between QTI 2.0 and 2.1 is that 2.0 updated the question item datamodel and interactions as well as the packaging piece. 2.1 updated everything else: the test model, results reporting etc. At the time, the team were aware that all of the specification needed to move from 1.x to 2.x, but wanted to do the most difficult and critical pieces first. They then found that a lot of people were keen on the remainder as well, so they immediately continued with 2.1 after completing 2.0. This means that items that were written to 2.0 are pretty much valid to 2.1 too- not much changed there. Regards, Wilbert |
|
|
|
|
|
08/11/2010 10:18 AM
|
|
|
Hi Wilbert,
thank you very much. |
|
|
|
|
FuseTalk Standard Edition v3.2 - © 1999-2010 FuseTalk Inc. All rights reserved.
