To post messages, you must join the IMS Public Community (free).   |   You also can also join the Common Cartridge Alliance.
IMS GLC Public Forums and Resources
Decrease font size
Increase font size
Topic Title: Some questions on QTI v2.1
Topic Summary:
Created On: 06/12/2009 02:46 PM
Status: Post and Reply
Linear : Threading : Single : Branch
Topic Tools Topic Tools
View topic in raw text format. Print this topic.
 06/13/2009 06:37 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message

Author Icon
tim_hunt

Posts: 7
Joined: 04/10/2009

On a technical level, it is certainly not a mistake to base a new assessment system around the QTI format, information and processing models. As you say, it is pretty complete and flexible.

On the other hand, QTI is neither so amazingly brilliant, nor so widely implemented, that if you ended up going your own way for some reason, no one could tell you that was a mistake either. Ultimately, it is your call.

I'm afraid that don't know enough to help you with the licensing questions.

I do find, coming from an open source background (I work on Moodle) that the culture of IMS is rather alien. When you remember that one of the goals of IMS is to persuade competing commercial suppliers to co-operate on interoperability, some things may possibly be easier to understand.
Statistics
3847 users are registered to the IMS GLC Public Forums and Resources forum.
There are currently 0 users logged in.

FuseTalk Standard Edition v3.2 - © 1999-2014 FuseTalk Inc. All rights reserved.

By participating in the forum, you agree to the abide by forum rules. You can view the IMS GLC Privacy Statement