 |
IMS Learner Information
Package Summary
of Changes
Version 1.0.1 Final
Specification
|
Copyright © 2005 IMS Global
Learning
Consortium, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
The IMS Logo is a registered trademark of IMS/GLC.
Document Name: IMS Learner Information Package Summary of
Changes
Revision: 04 January 2005
Date
Issued:
|
04
January 2005
|
Latest
version:
|
http://www.imsglobal.org/profiles/lipv1p0p1/imslip_sumcv1p0p1.html
|
Register
comments or
implementations:
|
http://www.imsglobal.org/developers/ims/imsforum/
|
|
IPR and Distribution Notices
Recipients of this document are requested to submit,
with
their comments, notification of any relevant patent claims or other
intellectual property rights of which they may be aware that might be
infringed by any implementation
of the specification set forth in this document, and to provide
supporting documentation.
IMS takes no position regarding the validity or scope of
any
intellectual property or other rights that might be claimed to pertain
to the implementation or use of the technology described in this
document or the extent to which any license under such rights might or
might not be available; neither does it represent that it has made any
effort to identify any such rights. Information on IMS's procedures
with respect to rights in IMS specifications can be found at the IMS
Intellectual Property Rights web page: http://www.imsglobal.org/ipr/imsipr_policyFinal.pdf.
Copyright © IMS Global Learning Consortium
2006. All
Rights Reserved.
If you wish to distribute this document or use this
document
to implement a product or service, you must complete a valid license
registration with IMS and receive an email from IMS granting the
license. To register, follow the instructions on the IMS website: http://www.imsglobal.org/specificationdownload.cfm.
This document may be copied and furnished to others by
Licensee organizations registered on the IMS website provided that the
above copyright notice and this paragraph are included on all such
copies. However, this document itself may not be modified in any way,
such as by removing the copyright notice or references to IMS, except
as needed for the purpose of developing IMS specifications, under the
auspices of a chartered IMS work group.
Use of this specification to develop products or
services is
governed by the license with IMS found on the IMS website: http://www.imsglobal.org/profiles/lipv1p0p1/lipv1p0p1speclicense.html.
The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and
will
not be revoked by IMS or its successors or assigns.
THIS SPECIFICATION IS BEING OFFERED WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY
WHATSOEVER, AND IN PARTICULAR, ANY WARRANTY OF NONINFRINGEMENT IS
EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMED. ANY USE OF THIS SPECIFICATION SHALL BE MADE
ENTIRELY AT THE IMPLEMENTER'S OWN RISK, AND NEITHER THE CONSORTIUM, NOR
ANY OF ITS MEMBERS OR SUBMITTERS, SHALL HAVE ANY LIABILITY WHATSOEVER
TO ANY IMPLEMENTER OR THIRD PARTY FOR ANY DAMAGES OF ANY NATURE
WHATSOEVER, DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, ARISING FROM THE USE OF THIS
SPECIFICATION.
|
Table of Contents
1. Introduction
1.1 Learner
Information Package
Overview
1.2 Scope and
Context
1.3 Structure of
this
Document
1.4 Nomenclature
1.5 References
2. Amendments and
Errata
Instructions
2.1 LIP Schema
Out of Date
2.1.1
Reference to LIP Issues List
2.1.2
Information Model Changes
2.1.3 XML
Binding Changes
2.1.4 Best
Practice Changes
2.2 Dates and
Times in IMS
LIP
2.2.1
Reference to LIP Issues List
2.2.2
Information Model Changes
2.2.3 XML
Binding Changes
2.2.4 Best
Practice Changes
2.3 Wrong ISO8601
Date
format
2.3.1
Reference to LIP Issues List
2.3.2
Information Model Changes
2.3.3 XML
Binding Changes
2.3.4 Best
Practice Changes
2.4 Inconsistent
Cardinality of
'description'
2.4.1
Reference to LIP Issues List
2.4.2
Information Model Changes
2.4.3 XML
Binding Changes
2.4.4 Best
Practice Changes
2.5 Usage of
'sourcedId'
2.5.1
Reference to LIP Issues List
2.5.2
Information Model Changes
2.5.3 XML
Binding Changes
2.5.4 Best
Practice Changes
2.6
'exrefrecord:recformat:entityref'
2.6.1
Reference to LIP Issues List
2.6.2
Information Model Changes
2.6.3 XML
Binding Changes
2.6.4 Best
Practice Changes
2.7 'exrefrecord:
recdata:
entityref'
2.7.1
Reference to LIP Issues List
2.7.2
Information Model Changes
2.7.3 XML
Binding Changes
2.7.4 Best
Practice Changes
2.8 Cardinality
of
'demographics'
2.8.1
Reference to LIP Issues List
2.8.2
Information Model Changes
2.8.3 XML
Binding Changes
2.8.4 Best
Practice Changes
2.9 Cardinality
of 'address'
2.9.1
Reference to LIP Issues List
2.9.2
Information Model Changes
2.9.3 XML
Binding Changes
2.9.4 Best
Practice Changes
2.10 Cardinality
of
'affiliation'
2.10.1
Reference to LIP Issues List
2.10.2
Information Model Changes
2.10.3 XML
Binding Changes
2.10.4 Best
Practice Changes
2.11 Cardinality
of
'formname'
2.11.1
Reference to LIP Issues List
2.11.2
Information Model Changes
2.11.3 XML
Binding Changes
2.11.4 Best
Practice Changes
2.12 Cardinality
of 'geo'
2.12.1
Reference to LIP Issues List
2.12.2
Information Model Changes
2.12.3 XML
Binding Changes
2.12.4 Best
Practice Changes
2.13 Cardinality
of 'goal'
2.13.1
Reference to LIP Issues List
2.13.2
Information Model Changes
2.13.3 XML
Binding Changes
2.13.4 Best
Practice Changes
2.14 Cardinality
of
'qcl.title'
2.14.1
Reference to LIP Issues List
2.14.2
Information Model Changes
2.14.3 XML
Binding Changes
2.14.4 Best
Practice Changes
2.15 Cardinality
of
'qcl.date'
2.15.1
Reference to LIP Issues List
2.15.2
Information Model Changes
2.15.3 XML
Binding Changes
2.15.4 Best
Practice Changes
2.16 Cardinality
of
'representation.date'
2.16.1
Reference to LIP Issues List
2.16.2
Information Model Changes
2.16.3 XML
Binding Changes
2.16.4 Best
Practice Changes
2.17 Naming of
'learningacitivtyref'
2.17.1
Reference to LIP Issues List
2.17.2
Information Model Changes
2.17.3 XML
Binding Changes
2.17.4 Best
Practice Changes
2.18 Telephony
Items
2.18.1
Reference to LIP Issues List
2.18.2
Information Model Changes
2.18.3 XML
Binding Changes
2.18.4 Best
Practice Changes
3. Deliverables
Appendix A - The
Initial
Issues
About This Document
Revision History
1. Introduction
1.1 Learner
Information Package
Overview
During the
development of the Learner
Information Package (LIP) specification the XML Binding was based
upon the Document Type Definition (DTD). The equivalent XML
Schema Definition (XSD) for LIP was not an official part of the
specification but developed as a tool for the community. The DTD
should be considered the definitive description for LIP v1.0. The
changes in this document bring the XSD in line with the DTD and
ensure that the DTD and Information Model correspond. Therefore,
in all cases the LIP v1.0.1 XSD should be used in place of the
LIP v1.0 schema.
The version 1.0 XSD
is replaced by the
version 1.0.1 XSD. The version 1.0.1 XSD is backwards compatible
with the DTD and therefore no custom user types have been
introduced that could not be supported by the DTD.
The LIP specification
describes data
structures, XML binding and accompanying best practices that are
used for the formatting, storage, and exchange of learner
information [LIP, 01a][LIP, 01b][LIP, 01c]. The specification
supports the exchange of learner information among learning
management systems, human resource systems, student information
systems, enterprise e-learning systems, knowledge management
systems, resume repositories, and other systems used in the
learning process. In this document, such systems will be called
learner information systems regardless of any other functionality
they possess or roles they fulfil. The LIP specification does not
address requests for learner information or the exchange
transaction mechanism.
At the current time,
it is the LIP v1.0
specification that is available in Final Release form to the
public.
1.2 Scope and Context
This document
describes amendments to be
made by adopters of the LIP v1.0 specification, thereby creating
the LIP v1.0.1 specification. Many typographical and elaborative
changes were made to clarify and correct the supporting
documents. The substantive differences between the v1.0 and the
v1.0.1 specifications are limited to:
- Updating the XML
schema to use formally
recommended XML Schema definitions;
- Correcting
typographical errors in the
binding of the <learningactivityref> element in the
Binding
document;
- <address>
<street> Setting
cardinality to O in the Binding in line with the Information
Model;
- <affiliation>
<date>
Setting cardinality to O n in the Binding in line with the
Information Model;
- <demographics>
<date>
Setting cardinality to O in the Binding in line with the
Information Model;
- <formname>
<text> Setting
cardinality to M in the Binding in line with the Information
Model;
- <goal><status>
Setting
cardinality to O in the Binding in line with the Information
Model;
- <qcl><title>
Setting
cardinality to M in the Binding in line with the Information
Model;
- <qcl><date>
Setting
cardinality to M n in the Binding in line with the Information
Model;
- <representation>
<date>
Setting cardinality to M n in the Binding in line with the
Information Model;
- <description><full>
Setting
cardinality to O in the Binding in line with the Information
Model;
- <description><long>
Setting
cardinality to O in the Binding in line with the Information
Model;
- Clarification for
use of the
<sourcedid> element;
- Bringing XSD in
line with the DTD.
1.3 Structure of
this Document
The structure of this
document is:
2.
Amendments And
Errata Instructions
|
The
resolution of the
issues that were not deferred until a later release. Each
instruction describes the changes to be made to the
documentation;
|
3.
Deliverables
|
The
set of documents
and supporting information that is released to form the IMS
Learner Information Package v1.0.1 specification;
|
Appendix
A - The
Initial Issues Presentation
|
The
initial set of
issues that were introduced as a part of this revision of the LIP
specification.
|
1.4 Nomenclature
DTD
|
Document
Type
Definition
|
LIP
|
Learner
Information
Package
|
LMS
|
Learning
Management
System
|
PLIRI
|
Persistent
Location
Independent Resource Identifier
|
URI
|
Universal
Resource
Identifier
|
URL
|
Universal
Resource
Locator
|
W3C
|
World
Wide Web
Consortium
|
XML
|
Extensible
Mark-up
Language
|
XSD
|
XML
Schema
Definition
|
XSD
|
XML
Schema
Definition
|
1.5 References
[LIP,
01a]
|
IMS
Learner
Information Package Information Model v1.0, R.Robson,
C.Smythe, F.Tansey, IMS/GLC, March 2001.
|
[LIP,
01b]
|
IMS
Learner
Information Package XML Binding v1.0, R.Robson, C.Smythe,
F.Tansey, IMS/GLC, March 2001.
|
[LIP,
01c]
|
IMS
Learner
Information Package Best Practice & Implementation Guidelines
v1.0, R.Robson, C.Smythe, F.Tansey, IMS/GLC,
March 2001.
|
2. Amendments and
Errata
Instructions
2.1 LIP Schema Out
of Date
2.1.1 Reference to
LIP Issues List
| Identifier |
Issue |
LIP
1-23
|
LIP
schemas to use the
correct W3C version.
|
2.1.2 Information
Model Changes
None.
2.1.3 XML Binding
Changes
Amendment
Instructions:
|
Within
the
<xsd:schema> element change the xmlns:xsd attribute
from:
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2000/10/XMLSchema"
to:
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
|
2.1.4 Best Practice
Changes
None.
2.2 Dates and Times
in IMS LIP
2.2.1 Reference to
LIP Issues List
| Identifier |
Issue |
LIP
1-43
|
Dates
and times in IMS
LIP.
|
2.2.2 Information
Model Changes
None.
2.2.3 XML Binding
Changes
The Schema should be
brought in line
with the DTD.
2.2.4 Best Practice
Changes
None.
2.3 Wrong ISO8601
Date format
2.3.1 Reference to
LIP Issues List
| Identifier |
Issue |
LIP
1-43
|
Wrong
ISO8601
format.
|
LIP
1-46
|
Wrong
ISO8601 format -
DTD perspective.
|
2.3.2 Information
Model Changes
None.
2.3.3 XML Binding
Changes
Amendment
Instructions:
|
Section
3.13.4
<date> Elements of the XML Binding document currently
reads
Example:
<date>
<typename>
<tysource sourcetype="imsdefault"/>
<tyvalue>Award</tyvalue>
</typename>
<datetime>2000:11:06</datetime>
<description>
<short>The date of the ward</short>
</description>
</date>
This should be changed
to:
<date>
<typename>
<tysource sourcetype="imsdefault"/>
<tyvalue>Award</tyvalue>
</typename>
<datetime>2000-11-06</datetime>
<description>
<short>The date of the ward</short>
</description>
</date>
in line with ISO8601
format of YYYY-MM-DD.
In addition the following examples also need to be changed
3.3.4
<date>
3.4.8
<date>
3.5.4
<date>
3.10.8
<date>
3.10.9
<status>
|
2.3.4 Best Practice
Changes
None.
2.4 Inconsistent
Cardinality of
'description'
2.4.1 Reference to
LIP Issues List
| Identifier |
Issue |
LIP
1-95
|
Description:
inconsistent cardinality.
|
LIP
1-98
|
Description:
inconsistent cardinality of Full.
|
LIP
1-98
|
Description:
inconsistent cardinality of Long.
|
2.4.2 Information
Model Changes
None.
2.4.3 XML Binding
Changes
Amendment
Instructions:
|
The
Information Model
describes short description as being a mandatory child of
description but the Binding describes it as optional.
Therefore:
'Section 3.13.3
Multiplicity: Occurs zero
or more times within the <description> element.'
should, be altered to
read:
'Section 3.13.3
Multiplicity: Occurs once
or more times within the <description> element.'
The diagram should be
altered to read:
The examples
should be changed
appropriately.
|
2.4.4 Best Practice
Changes
None.
2.5 Usage of
'sourcedId'
2.5.1 Reference to
LIP Issues List
| Identifier |
Issue |
LIP
1-99
|
SourcedId:
Clarification required.
|
2.5.2 Information
Model Changes
Amendment
Instructions:
|
Definition is
given as "global user identifier"- if this is the case, it cannot
be used to identify a component of LIP outside of a document.
Section 13.3.1.1 of the
Information Model
should be altered to read:
|
13.3.1.1
|
sourcedid
|
The
initiating
system's source identification for the learner information.
|
C
|
|
|
|
If
the entry is not
defined as a 'sourcedid' it MUST be an 'indexid'.
sourcedid is only to be
used to identify
the subject
|
2.5.3 XML Binding
Changes
None.
2.5.4 Best Practice
Changes
None.
2.6
'exrefrecord:recformat:entityref'
2.6.1 Reference to
LIP Issues List
| Identifier |
Issue |
LIP
1-100
|
Exrefrecord:
Entityref
undefined in original XSD binding.
|
2.6.2 Information
Model Changes
None.
2.6.3 XML Binding
Changes
Bring the Schema in
line with the
DTD.
2.6.4 Best Practice
Changes
None.
2.7 'exrefrecord:
recdata:
entityref'
2.7.1 Reference to
LIP Issues List
| Identifier |
Issue |
LIP
1-101
|
Exrefrecord:
RecData.Entityref undefined in original XSD binding.
|
2.7.2 Information
Model Changes
None.
2.7.3 XML Binding
Changes
Bring the Schema in
line with the
DTD.
2.7.4 Best Practice
Changes
None.
2.8 Cardinality of
'demographics'
2.8.1 Reference to
LIP Issues List
| Identifier |
Issue |
LIP
1-102
|
General:
Various
cardinality inconsistencies.
|
2.8.2 Information
Model Changes
Amendment
Instructions:
|
<demographics>
<date>
Cardinality is inconsistent: between the Information Model which
has O n, and the Binding has zero or once.
Section 2.7.4.1 should
be altered to
read:
|
2.7.4.1
|
date
|
Recorded
dates
appropriate to the representation.
|
O
|
|
As
per structure 13.6
(Table 6.13).
|
2.8.3 XML Binding
Changes
None.
2.8.4 Best Practice
Changes
None.
2.9 Cardinality of
'address'
2.9.1 Reference to
LIP Issues List
| Identifier |
Issue |
LIP
1-102
|
General:
Various
cardinality inconsistencies.
|
2.9.2 Information
Model Changes
None.
2.9.3 XML Binding
Changes
Amendment
Instructions:
|
<address>
<street>
Cardinality is inconsistent: The Information Model has zero;
Binding has zero or more.
Binding document section
3.2.5.5
<street> element's multiplicity should be changed to
read:
Multiplicity:
Occurs zero or
once within the <address> element.
The diagram is correct.
|
2.9.4 Best Practice
Changes
None.
2.10 Cardinality of
'affiliation'
2.10.1 Reference to
LIP Issues
List
| Identifier |
Issue |
LIP
1-102
|
General:
Various
cardinality inconsistencies.
|
2.10.2 Information
Model Changes
None.
2.10.3 XML Binding
Changes
Amendment
Instructions:
|
<affiliation>
<date>
Binding document section
3.10.6.4
<date> element's multiplicity should be changed to
read:
Multiplicity:
Occurs zero or
many times within the <affiliation> element.
The diagram is correct.
The DTD and XSD are
valid.
|
2.10.4 Best Practice
Changes
None.
2.11 Cardinality of
'formname'
2.11.1 Reference to
LIP Issues
List
| Identifier |
Issue |
LIP
1-102
|
General:
Various
cardinality inconsistencies.
|
2.11.2 Information
Model Changes
Amendment
Instructions:
|
<formname>
<text>
Cardinality is
inconsistent: Information
Model has M, Binding has zero or once.
The Information Model
should be changed to
O.
|
2.11.3 XML Binding
Changes
None.
2.11.4 Best Practice
Changes
None.
2.12 Cardinality of
'geo'
2.12.1 Reference to
LIP Issues
List
| Identifier |
Issue |
LIP
1-102
|
General:
Various
cardinality inconsistencies.
|
2.12.2 Information
Model Changes
None.
2.12.3 XML Binding
Changes
Bring the Schema in
line with the
DTD.
2.12.4 Best Practice
Changes
None.
2.13 Cardinality of
'goal'
2.13.1 Reference to
LIP Issues
List
| Identifier |
Issue |
LIP
1-102
|
General:
Various
cardinality inconsistencies.
|
2.13.2 Information
Model Changes
Amendment
Instructions:
|
<goal><status>
Cardinality is inconsistent between the Information Model and the
Binding.
Section 4.6 of the
Information Model
should be altered to read:
|
4.6
|
Status
|
Recorded status of
the goal.
|
O
|
|
As
per structure 13.8
(Table 6.13).
|
2.13.3 XML Binding
Changes
None.
2.13.4 Best Practice
Changes
None.
2.14 Cardinality of
'qcl.title'
2.14.1 Reference to
LIP Issues
List
| Identifier |
Issue |
LIP
1-102
|
General:
Various
cardinality inconsistencies.
|
2.14.2 Information
Model Changes
None.
2.14.3 XML Binding
Changes
Bring the Schema in
line with the
DTD.
2.14.4 Best Practice
Changes
None.
2.15 Cardinality of
'qcl.date'
2.15.1 Reference to
LIP Issues
List
| Identifier |
Issue |
LIP
1-102
|
General:
Various
cardinality inconsistencies.
|
2.15.2 Information
Model Changes
None.
2.15.3 XML Binding
Changes
Bring the Schema in
line with the
DTD.
2.15.4 Best Practice
Changes
None.
2.16 Cardinality of
'representation.date'
2.16.1 Reference to
LIP Issues
List
| Identifier |
Issue |
LIP
1-102
|
General:
Various
cardinality inconsistencies.
|
2.16.2 Information
Model Changes
None.
2.16.3 XML Binding
Changes
Amendment
Instructions:
|
In
Section 3.2.7.6
<date> of the Binding document Multiplicity should be
altered to read:
Multiplicity:
Occurs zero
or many times within the <demographics> and
<representation> elements.
Replace Figure 3.8 with:
|
2.16.4 Best Practice
Changes
None.
2.17 Naming of
'learningacitivtyref'
2.17.1 Reference to
LIP Issues
List
| Identifier |
Issue |
LIP
1-103
|
Typo:
learning
activity ref.
|
2.17.2 Information
Model Changes
None.
2.17.3 XML Binding
Changes
Amendment
Instructions:
|
Learningactivityref
is
misspelled as "learneractivityref" in Binding section 3.5.7
Amend the example in
section 3.5.7 of the
Binding document from:
<learneractivityref>
<sourcedid>
<source>IMS_LIP_V1p0_Example</source>
<id>course_101</id>
</sourcedid>
</learneractivityref>
to the correct spelling:
<learningactivityref>
<sourcedid>
<source>IMS_LIP_V1p0_Example</source>
<id>course_101</id>
</sourcedid>
</learningactivityref>
The DTD and XSD Bindings
and the diagram
are correct.
|
2.17.4 Best Practice
Changes
None.
2.18 Telephony Items
2.18.1 Reference to
LIP Issues
List
| Identifier |
Issue |
LIP
1-143
|
Binding
of telephony
as Integers in XSD (from BSI).
|
2.18.2 Information
Model Changes
None.
2.18.3 XML Binding
Changes
Amendment
Instructions:
|
Telephony
items
(numbers, codes, etc.) are defined in the Binding document as
being declared as String, but are defined as Integer within the
XML schemas.
The following datatypes
should be changed
from xsd:int to xsd:string:
- <areacode>
- <countrycode>
- <extnumber>
- <indnumber>
|
2.18.4 Best Practice
Changes
None.
3. Deliverables
The set of
deliverables to be issued as
the IMS Content Packaging v1.1.4 specification and documentation
set is:
- IMS Learner
Information Package Summary
of Changes, Version 1.0.1 (this document);
- IMS Learner
Information Package v1.0.1
XSD;
- IMS Learner
Information Package v1.0.1
Examples set.
Appendix A - The
Initial Issues
In Table A1 is the
list of original
issues that were reviewed as part of the maintenance process.
There are four possible states for the issue:
- Resolved - the
resolution of this issue
has been addressed in this document;
- Rejected - the
issue has been
considered and rejected due to various reasons, e.g., a wrongly
identified fault;
- Duplicated - this
issue is a duplicate
of another in the list. An associated note identifies the other
entry;
- Deferred - this
issue can only be
resolved by the addition of new functionality or making changes
that will cause problems with backwards compatibility. These
issues will be considered as a part of a LIP v1.1
development.
Key:
Type: O = Other
CI = Conflicting Information
LC = Lacks Clarity
T = Typographic error
DC = Document Content
FR = Feature Request
Table
A1 List of LIP
issues.
| Issue |
Type |
Document |
Title |
Status |
23
|
O
|
Schema
|
LIP
Schemas out of
date
|
Resolved
|
43
|
CI
|
Schema
|
Dates
and times in IMS
LIP
|
Resolved
|
92
|
CI
|
Information
Model
|
Temporal:
Cardinality
Inconsistent
|
Resolved
|
93
|
CI
|
Information
Model
|
Privacy:
Cardinality
Inconsistent
|
Resolved
|
94
|
CI
|
Information
Model
|
Privacy:
Cardinality
Inconsistent
|
Resolved
|
95
|
CI
|
Information
Model
|
Description:
Cardinality Inconsistent
|
Resolved
|
96
|
O
|
Information
Model
|
Description:
Type
Inconsistent
|
Resolved
|
97
|
CI
|
Information
Model
|
Description:
Cardinality Inconsistent
|
Resolved
|
98
|
CI
|
Information
Model
|
Description:
Cardinality Inconsistent
|
Resolved
|
99
|
LC
|
Information
Model
|
Sourcedid
Clarification Required
|
Resolved
|
100
|
CI
|
Information
Model
|
Exrefrecord:
entityref
undefined in binding
|
Resolved
|
101
|
CI
|
Information
Model
|
xrefrecord.recdata.entityref
undefined in
binding
|
Resolved
|
102
|
CI
|
Information
Model
|
General:
various
Cardinality Inconsistencies
|
Resolved
|
103
|
T
|
Information
Model
|
Typo:
Learning
activity ref
|
Resolved
|
104
|
DC
|
Information
Model
|
Datetime:
does not
conform to IS8601
|
Resolved
|
105
|
DC
|
Information
Model
|
Area
Code: Cardinality
Inappropriate
|
Deferred
|
106
|
O
|
Information
Model
|
General:
inconsistency
in string lengths
|
Resolved
|
107
|
FR
|
Information
Model
|
Identification
Support
Legacy Address Formats
|
Resolved
|
108
|
DC
|
Information
Model
|
Activity
units
cardinality too restrictive
|
Deferred
|
109
|
DC
|
Information
Model
|
Accessibility:
Not
consistent with ACCLIP
|
Deferred
|
111
|
O
|
Information
Model
|
IndexID
Binding
|
Resolved
|
114
|
O
|
Information
Model
|
Product
|
Deferred
|
115
|
O
|
Information
Model
|
Bring
Extension
Mechanism in line with more recent practice
|
Deferred
|
116
|
O
|
Information
Model
|
Langstring-Various
Issues
|
Deferred
|
131
|
FR
|
Schema
|
LIP/ACCLIP
integration
issues
|
Deferred
|
117
|
FR
|
Information
Model
|
Need
new statement
|
Deferred
|
118
|
O
|
Information
Model
|
Bundling
resource type
identifiers
|
Deferred
|
119
|
O
|
Information
Model
|
Result
Hierarchy
|
Deferred
|
120
|
O
|
Information
Model
|
UID
Issues
|
Deferred
|
121
|
O
|
Information
Model
|
Formatted
Addresses
|
Deferred
|
122
|
O
|
Information
Model
|
Representation
of
geographic information
|
Deferred
|
123
|
FR
|
Information
Model
|
Ownership/Contribution
rights - changes to identification and contenttype
|
Deferred
|
124
|
O
|
Information
Model
|
Issues
around
vocabularies
|
Deferred
|
125
|
O
|
Information
Model
|
LIP/Enterprise
person
reconciliation
|
Deferred
|
130
|
CI
|
Schema
|
LIP/ACCLIP
integration
issues
|
Deferred
|
143
|
CI
|
Schema
|
Binding
of telephony
as integers in XSD
|
Resolved
|
144
|
DC
|
Information
Model
|
Datetimes
and ISO8601:
Length restriction
|
Resolved
|
145
|
DC
|
Information
Model
|
Area
code should be
optional
|
Deferred
|
132
|
LC
|
Information
Model
|
Demographics
|
Deferred
|
133
|
FR
|
Information
Model
|
Reflection
|
Deferred
|
135
|
O
|
Information
Model
|
Nationality
|
Deferred
|
137
|
DC
|
Information
Model
|
Geo
should conform to
ISO 6709
|
Deferred
|
138
|
FR
|
Information
Model
|
Owner
and Creator
Metadata
|
Deferred
|
139
|
DC
|
Information
Model
|
Vocabularies
|
Deferred
|
140
|
FR
|
Information
Model
|
Affiliation
|
Deferred
|
141
|
FR
|
Information
Model
|
Name
Context
|
Deferred
|
142
|
FR
|
Information
Model
|
Review
of
identification
|
Deferred
|
146
|
FR
|
Information
Model
|
Ink
color in
screenEnhancement
|
Deferred
|
151
|
FR
|
Information
Model
|
Modularity
in avoiding
color combinations
|
Deferred
|
About This Document
Title
|
IMS
Learner
Information Package Summary of Changes
|
Editor
|
Colin
Smythe (IMS)
|
Version
|
1.0.1
|
Version
Date
|
04
January 2005
|
Status
|
Final
Specification
|
Summary
|
This
document
describes the changes made to the Learner Information Package
specification documents.
|
Revision
Information
|
04
January 2005
|
Purpose
|
This
document has been
approved by the IMS Technical Board and is made available for
adoption.
|
Document
Location
|
http://www.imsglobal.org/profiles/lipv1p0p1/imslip_sumcv1p0p1.html
|
Revision History
| Version
No. |
Release
Date |
Comments |
Final
1.0.1
|
04
January 2005
|
The
'IMS Learner
Information Package Summary of Changes' document describes the
amendments and errata changes made to the LIP v1.0
specification.
|
IMS Global Learning
Consortium, Inc.
("IMS/GLC") is publishing the information contained in this
IMS Learner Information Package Summary of Changes
("Specification") for purposes of scientific, experimental,
and scholarly collaboration only.
IMS/GLC makes no warranty or representation regarding the
accuracy or completeness of the Specification.
This material is provided on an "As Is" and "As Available"
basis.
The Specification is at all times subject to change and revision
without notice.
It is your sole responsibility to evaluate the usefulness,
accuracy, and completeness of the Specification as it relates to
you.
IMS/GLC would appreciate receiving your comments and
suggestions.
Please contact IMS/GLC through our website at http://www.imsglobal.org
Please refer to Document Name: IMS Learner Information
Package Summary of Changes Revision: 04 January
2005
