I wondering if the specification implicitly ties behavior of the urn:lti:instrole:ims/lis/None role to being akin to an anonymous user. So if a request comes in to a Provider, and the role is None, the provider should treat them as an anonymous user/viewer.
Cheers,
Steve
Submitted by sgithens (not verified) on Wed, 2011-12-14 14:01
Anonymous BLTI Roles
In reading http://www.imsglobal.org/lti/v1p1pd/ltiIMGv1p1pd.html, I don't see anything about anonymous users (unless I missed it).
I wondering if the specification implicitly ties behavior of the urn:lti:instrole:ims/lis/None role to being akin to an anonymous user. So if a request comes in to a Provider, and the role is None, the provider should treat them as an anonymous user/viewer.
Cheers,
Steve